Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: 1st Series: Amazon.co.uk.
Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. A Collaborative Work. Edited by A. G. Guest. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961. Pp. XVIII, 292. (REVIEW) A. P. D'Entreves - 1963.
These essays deal with central and controversial issues in jurisprudence. This volume emphasizes legal theory, and the collection will be of interest to students of and others involved with political philosophy as well as law students and philosophers.
The Faculty of Law will be holding a special faculty-wide webinar on Friday 5 June 2020 on Covid-19 and the law. Legal scholars will explore the role and challenges for law as part of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic and its consequences.
Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence:. Oxford University Press, 2000 - Law - 270 pages. 0 Reviews. The fourth collection of essays in this long-established series brings together some of the leading contributors to the study of the philosophical foundations of common law. Key issues in contract, tort, and criminal law are subjected to.
You may encounter three other contrasts: (a) analytical jurusprudence v evaluative jurisprudence; (b) analytical jursiprudence v critical jurisprudence and (c) analytical essay v descriptive essay. Contrast (a) is the contrast between understanding what law is (the very nature of law) and judging whether it (or some of it) is worthwhile, legitimate etc.
All law schools have explicit criteria regarding what constitutes a first class essay, an upper second, a lower second, and so on, and these may differ superficially However, there is an overwhelming consensus regarding what is required to achieve a high mark in a law essay, whether as an assignment or an exam.
All of our essay prizes are judged by senior academics from the University of Oxford. The judges will choose their favourite essay from each subject category and an overall 'best essay' across seven subjects: Philosophy, Politics, Economics, History, Psychology, Theology and Law.